Labour proposals for a new charge on overseas visitors

 

Responding to the news that a Labour Government would introduce a new charge on visitors from countries that are not required to obtain a visa to enter the UK in order to fund 1,000 additional Border Force staff, Nathan Stower, Chief Executive of the British Air Transport Association (BATA), said:

 

“While we welcome the desire to improve the customer experience for passengers arriving at the UK border, airlines have significant concerns about this proposal.

 

“Visitors from countries like the USA and Australia already pay the highest air passenger tax in the world to fly to the UK – £71 from next April – contributing billions of pounds to the Treasury. Adding yet another charge will make the UK more uncompetitive in attracting tourists, businesses and inbound investment.

 

“It is not clear how this proposed charge would be collected. The vast majority of visitors from those countries that are not required to obtain a visa to enter the UK, such as the USA, do not currently provide information to UK authorities ahead of their visit. Furthermore, if more money were to be raised from airline passengers alone, it would only fair for this to fund improvements in the border at airports and not at other ports of entry such as Calais.”

 

ENDS

18th November 2014

BATA responds to Airports Commission

Responding to the Airports Commission’s consultation on its appraisal of the three shortlisted options, Nathan Stower, Chief Executive of the British Air Transport Association (BATA), said:

 

“The Airports Commission’s final recommendation must be cost effective, offer value for money, and not rely on today’s passengers paying for infrastructure that won’t be ready until at least the mid-2020s. UK airlines will study the appraisal of each option in detail to judge whether the plan is supported by a robust business case with realistic forecasts and a credible funding mechanism. I hope our politicians will wait for the results of this consultation and the Commission’s final report so that political decisions can be taken with the fullest evidence.”

 

ENDS

11th November 2014

BATA responds to Supreme Court air passenger compensation decision

Commenting on today’s Supreme Court decision to refuse applications to appeal decisions in two cases about the liability of airlines to pay compensation after travel delays, Nathan Stower, the Chief Executive of the body representing UK airlines, the British Air Transport Association (BATA), said:

“Today’s Supreme Court decision is both surprising and disappointing.  UK airlines support the principle of passenger protection and always meet their legal obligations. However, the rules should be clear, affordable and proportionate for the sake of passengers and airlines. The current system fails those tests and this decision will further increase costs which ultimately are borne by all passengers.

“Vital reform of the EU regulation has recently stalled in Brussels due to disagreements between the Spanish and UK governments over Gibraltar. These differences must now be urgently resolved to allow the necessary reforms to proceed.”

 

ENDS

 

31st October 2014

Air passengers taxed over £27 billion in inflation busting 20 years of APD

Industry Campaign renews call for urgent review and reduction of ‘damaging’ tax ahead of 2015

 

This Saturday, 1 November, marks 20 years since Air Passenger Duty (APD) was first levied on passengers flying from UK airports, and the A Fair Tax on Flying campaign today reveals the Government’s staggering £27.035 billion tax take over this period.

This figure comes amidst new research that a family of four taking one holiday a year in Europe, with an occasional trip to a longer haul destination such as the US every fifth year, would have paid an inflation-busting £1,244 in the life of this punishing tax.

APD was introduced by then Chancellor of the Exchequer, Kenneth Clarke, in the 1993 Budget, and it was levied from the following November at £5 for flights within the EEA and £10 elsewhere. The tax (which is paid by nearly all passengers flying from UK airports) has since risen dramatically, at around four times the rate of inflation over the same period for short haul and at a whopping twenty times the rate of inflation for long haul – and now APD is the highest tax of its kind anywhere in the world.

Presenting  a ‘nice little earner’ for successive Governments since 1994, it is predicted that APD will bring in around £3.2billion in 2014/2015 – putting it firmly amongst the top yielding stealth taxes, despite recent positive reforms to the tax on long haul flights.

The A Fair Tax on Flying campaign is renewing its calls for the Government to undertake an urgent review and reduction of the duty ahead of next year’s General Election.

 

  1. Damaging for business and the UK economy – a more competitive APD rate would help the UK win global race, say industry leaders

Industry leaders in business, tourism, and aviation who make up the campaign have argued that APD makes goods and services more expensive, while discouraging investment, inbound tourism, and growth, all the while leaving the UK less competitive.

  1. Hits consumers hard – APD defies Government’s own ‘family test’ 

As well pushing up the cost of business travel through the UK, APD also makes foreign travel less affordable for holidaymakers, especially for families, who receive no tax ‘break’ on children’s  flights, as for other goods and services.

An estimated £1 billion of last year’s £3 billion APD coffers were raised by leisure travellers. With a family of four now paying on average £52 in taxes for short-haul flights and £276 on long-haul flights to a favourite destination such as Florida, or £340 to destinations such as Jamaica, India and Pakistan which are important for diaspora communities visiting friends and relatives, the campaign is arguing that the tax is out of step with the Government’s own family test.

Consumers agree – with research by ABTA in summer 2014 showing that 4 in 10 consumers now say high levels of APD have put them off flying, while 3 in 10 would consider flying from other airports outside the UK to avoid the tax.

  1. UK is out of step – other countries are reducing or reforming the tax whilst ours creeps up

Out of 28 EU countries, only four others levy some form of air passenger tax. Critically, those flying from UK airports pay as much as 5 times the amount in departure duties than if they flew from competing airports in Germany, France, Italy and Austria.

Belgium, Denmark, Holland, Malta, and Norway have all scrapped their APD equivalent taxes in recent years, and Germany has frozen theirs. And so the campaign is calling on the UK to bring the policy in line with our neighbours and competitors in Europe.

  1. Twenty years on, ‘A Fair Tax on Flying’ campaigners say urgent review and reduction should be a priority

Mark Tanzer, Chief Executive of ABTA – the Travel Association, said:  “After 20 years, APD seems to have become entrenched in the revenue-raising arsenal of the Treasury, yet it fails to meet so many of the Government’s own aims, both to support families and build our economy. For the sake of vital jobs, growth and the very valuable investment families make into visiting friends and relatives, a serious look at reforming and reducing this unpopular and harmful tax is now needed more than ever.”

Darren Caplan, Chief Executive of the Airport Operators Association, said: “Two decades is a long time for such an eye-wateringly high and regressive tax to be in place, and the huge Treasury revenues revealed today give a clear indication of why the Government is reticent of challenging the status quo. We believe this is short sighted: air passenger taxes, like APD, are proven to harm national economies, and the Government now needs to get us in step with our competitors, to boost jobs, growth and UK connectivity.”

Dale Keller, Chief Executive of BAR-UK, said:  “We are confident that a Treasury led review of APD would confirm the damage being done to our economy and the UK’s global competitiveness. We believe that an urgent re-examination will reveal the very real opportunity to raise more revenues in the longer term through stimulating the economy. In light of 20 years that the duty has grown disproportionately and inhibited growth, we urge the Chancellor to do more to support business and ordinary consumers and reform the tax.”

Nathan Stower, Chief Executive of BATA, said:   “It is a scandal that an island trading nation like the UK still has the world’s highest tax on flying despite recent positive changes to long-haul rates. Few countries have followed the UK’s example in taxing air passengers and policymakers should stop and consider why. Countries such as the Netherlands and Ireland have abolished their equivalent taxes having recognised their damaging economic impact.”

 

ENDS

Reduce Air Passenger Duty to boost domestic air connectivity

The British Air Transport Association (BATA) – the body representing UK airlines – has today urged the Government to reduce Air Passenger Duty to boost domestic air connectivity. Commenting on the news that the Department for Transport has signed a second public service obligation to protect the Newquay-Gatwick route involving £2.5 million of central government funding, BATA Chief Executive, Nathan Stower, said:

“A few domestic routes are not sustainable without public support and I am pleased that the Government recognises the importance of regional air connectivity. The Government could support other domestic services by simply reducing Air Passenger Duty – the world’s highest tax on flying. At £26 for a return ticket on domestic flights, APD hits people flying within the UK for business and leisure particularly hard. It’s crazy that the Newquay-Gatwick service could raise up to £2.6 million in Air Passenger Duty in its first year alone – £100k more than the £2.5 million central government support provided over four years for this public service obligation route.”

 

ENDS

Thames Estuary – UK airline industry response to Airports Commission decision

Trade body for UK airlines responds to Airports Commission decision on Thames estuary option

Responding to the Airport Commission‘s decision to rule out the inner Thames estuary option, Nathan Stower, Chief Executive of the British Air Transport Association (BATA), said:

“Britain needs additional runway capacity in the South East of England, but not at any price. With the Thames estuary option sensibly ruled out for good, the Airports Commission is free now to concentrate on scrutinising the business cases of the three shortlisted options. The proposals must be cost effective and offer value for money.  There needs to be a credible funding mechanism based on realistic forecasts and today’s passengers must not be expected to pay for tomorrow’s infrastructure.”

 

ENDS

 

Nathan Stower Appointed As New BATA Chief Executive

Nathan Stower has been appointed as Chief Executive of the British Air Transport Association (BATA), the trade body representing UK-registered airlines.

Nathan will join BATA on 18 August. He is currently Head of Public Affairs at the Association of Train Operating Companies and was previously Parliamentary and External Affairs Manager at Virgin Atlantic Airways. He will take over from Simon Buck, who is retiring.

Barry Humphreys, Chairman of BATA, commented: “I am delighted that Nathan has agreed to join BATA and lead the organisation over the coming years. There is no shortage of challenges facing UK airlines and I have no doubt that Nathan will be able to play a leading role in meeting them and taking BATA to a new level.

“I would like to thank Simon for his hard work and successful leadership over the past four years. The appointment of a new Chief Executive presents the opportunity to review objectives and launch fresh initiatives and I very much look forward to working with Nathan going forward.”

Nathan Stower added: “It’s a huge privilege to represent Britain’s airlines, which are widely recognised as among the best in the world. Passengers, businesses and the British economy must continue to benefit from our competitive, dynamic and innovative sector.

“With a range of crucial political and regulatory issues affecting our members up for discussion and decision over the next few years, now is an important time for the sector to talk passionately about its existing contribution and future ambitions. I look forward to building on Simon’s achievements and working with our members, the BATA team, stakeholders and the wider aviation industry to help support a growing and vibrant airline sector.”

ENDS

BATA Chief Executive to Retire

The British Air Transport Association, the trade body for UK airlines, has announced that its Chief Executive, Simon Buck, will retire from the organisation in September 2014, after 4 years in the role.  A recruitment process has been launched to find his successor.

Barry Humphreys, Chairman of BATA, expressed his gratitude to Simon for his contribution to BATA’s work over recent years.  “Despite deregulation in some areas, aviation continues to be a highly regulated industry, subject to considerable political intervention.  If anything, therefore, the role of an airline trade body has become even more important and BATA has had to evolve to meet the growing challenges.  Simon has been central to that development and has played a key role in ensuring that BATA’s, and its airline members’, voices have been heard by government and regulators.  Today BATA is a more active and visible organisation than when Simon joined, for which he should take much of the credit.  He will be a hard act to follow, but we wish him all the best in his retirement”.

Simon Buck commented: “I have enjoyed working in this high profile role.  I became involved in aviation for the first time some 25 years ago and will miss many colleagues, both within the BATA membership, across the spectrum of the industry and in regulatory circles. But I am now looking forward to early retirement and seeing more of my family which will involve my being overseas for much of the time. I wish my eventual successor every happiness and success in rising to the challenges which airlines continue to face.”

Anyone wanting details of the Chief Executive post should contact BATA on 020 7222 9494 or e-mail [email protected].

ENDS

Budget 2014 – Air Tax Changes

Simon Buck, Chief Executive of the British Air Transport Association (BATA), responding to the changes announced to Air Passenger Duty (APD) in today’s Budget Statement, said:

“BATA welcomes the Government’s reforms to the Air Passenger Duty at this Budget which reduces the overall tax take.

 “This will save passengers travelling long-haul for leisure and business purposes over £200m each year compared to the level previously set out. 

 “We hope this positive first step recognising the damage caused by this tax will lead to the Government undertaking further reforms of APD in future, such as on the double tax hit on domestic flights.”

 

 ENDS

CAA Final Decision on Airport Charges and Regulation – BATA Reaction

Simon Buck, Chief Executive of the British Air Transport Association (BATA), responding to the publication today of the CAA’s final decision on airport charges and regulation for Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted, said:

“BATA airlines remain disappointed overall with the final decision on airport charges published by the CAA today.

“BATA supports improving the passenger experience and we believe this can be done without a repeat of the incredibly steep price rises we have seen in airport charges in the last few years. Prices at Heathrow are triple the level they were ten years ago and we believe there should be far deeper cuts in charges applied to each passenger at this airport for the next five year period instead of a further hike as is being permitted.

“At Gatwick, BATA airlines welcome the CAA’s decision that the airport requires continued regulation through an airport licence and that the costs of any second runway would be included in the licence in order to allow for scrutiny by the regulator.

“CAA’s announcement that its regulatory oversight will also now extend to the development of robust plans to deliver operational resilience to major disruption should also be welcomed.”

 

ENDS